In practice, the instrumental evaluation of
hearing is limited to the functions provided by the peripheral part of
corresponding transmissional and perceptional
anatomical structures of the ear.
These structures
contribute in all or partly to the detection of the presence of the acoustic
stimuli, to the function of discrimination, i.e. the detection of their
variations of intensity and frequency, to the resolution of their temporal
profile and finally to their spectral analysis.
Despite of the normality of this auditory
assessment, some subjects present nevertheless difficulties in listening and
intelligibility. Such difficulties can be the consequence of disorders related
to the cognitive and memory functions in their respective complexities, but
also the functions provided by central auditory pathways. One holds for these last the term of ‘Central
Auditory Processes (CAP)’ and that of ‘Central Auditory
Processing Disorders (CAPD)’in the pictures which can result from
their dysfunctions.
Non
exhaustively, CAP are the neuronal mechanisms responsible for the following
behavioural phenomena: binaural interactions such as sound localisation,
lateralisation and binaural fusion, phonemic discrimination, recognition of the
temporal aspects of audition including
detection of changes in frequency, amplitude, duration, shape and
pattern of auditory stimuli, detection of time intervals between auditory
stimuli, temporal masking, temporal integration and temporal ordering, auditory
performances with competing or degraded acoustic signals.
CAPD is an observed deficiency in one or more
of the above listed mechanisms dedicated to audition. In its pure form, it
should be conceptualized as a deficit in the processing of auditory input : APD for Auditory Processing Disorders.
Nevertheless, CAPD like symptoms may originate
from a more general dysfunction that affects performances across modalities. Intellectual
faculties, higher level neurocognitive processes,
learning, long term language immersion, memory, attention and motivation are to
be considered in the assessment of CAPD : (c)APD
for (central) Auditory Processing Disorder !
This definition tends towards the view of the
potential for interaction between disorders originating at both
mechanisms, the processing of acoustic information and the non-dedicated
processes. Their deployment in service of central auditory processing underlies
the frequently clinical association between (c)APD
and
speech and language disorders, learning disabilities, attention deficit and
hyperactivity disorders, psychological, emotional and social problems.
Tests of central auditory function can be
categorized in a variety of ways, e.g., monotic, diotic, dichotic, speech or nonspeech
tests. As test results from meaningful speech items may be influenced by
non-dedicated processes, tests based on tonal, noise and phonetic stimuli
should be prefered.
A basic set of central auditory evaluation
tests should be composed at least of :
-
intensity, frequency
and phonetic discrimination tests ;
-
temporal resolution
tests, (e.g. gap detection) ;
-
low redundancy speech
tests, (i.e. speech in noise, filtered,
compressed, expanded, interrupted or reverberated speech signals) ;
-
dichotic speech tests ;
-
temporal
configuration or patterning tests ;
-
binaural interaction tests.
Because the potential interaction of dedicated
and non auditory dedicated processes dysfunctions, intellectual quotient, basic
cognitive, speech and language development, memory, attention and psychological
status are to be evaluated. As result of this, a multidisciplinary approach is
mandatory.
Every dedicated or not auditory dedicated
evaluation test should never be used in rehabilitation programs.
The recommendation was approved by
the general assembly of the BIAP after the validation by the national
committees, may 2007 in Rhodos
(
This recommendation is based on a
multidisciplinary cooperation
President of the commission: DEMANEZ
Jean-Pierre (
Vice Presidents :
DRACH Manfred (
Members : DELAROCHE Monique (France) ;
DEMANEZ Laurent (Belgium) ; ENDERLE-AMMOUR Ahsen
(Germany) ; Fagnoul François (Belgium) ;
HERMAN Nadine (Belgium) ; KUPHAL Frank (Germany) ; LHUSSIER Thérèse (Belgium) ; LUX-WELLENDOF Gabriele
(Germany) ; MARTIAT Benoît (Belgium) ;
MELIS Nelly (France) ; PIRSON Sabine (Belgium) ; RENGLET Thierry
(Belgium) ; SAMAIN Philippe (Belgium) ; SCHRAM Ghislaine
(Switzerland) ; TARABBO Antoine (France) ; VERHEYDEN Patrick
(Belgium) ; WIESNER Thomas (Germany).