CAPD annexe 2 - Disponibilité des tests

CT-30 Les Processus Auditifs Centraux

Annexe 2

Disponibilité des tests

A ce jour, seuls des tests publiés en français, anglais, allemand et néérlandais ont pu être collectés. Cette liste n’est certainement pas exhaustive.

Idéalement, une batterie d’évaluation de la fonction auditive centrale devrait être constituée au minimum :


Tests de discrimination.

Intensité et fréquence

                Lüscher, SISI test … (Audiomètres commerciaux )

                Wave discriminator (Demanez) (5)

                Distorsions (Lasry) 22

Temps

                Gap test, (Demanez) (5)

                Distorsions (Lasry) (22)

                Psychoakustisches Testsystem (PATSY) (6)

                Brain Boy (7)

Phonèmes

                Auditory Discrimination Test (ADT), (Reynolds, 1987)

                Heidelberger Lautdifferenzierungstest (H-LAD) (8)

                Hannoverscher Lautdiskriminationstest (9)

                Bremer Lautdiskriminationstest (10)

                Mottiertest (18)

                Auditory speech sounds Evaluation (A§E), (Govaerts) (20)

Tests vocaux à faible redondance

Low-pass filtering (Bocca, Calearo et Cassinari, 1953)

                Yvey filtered speech test (2)

                Low-pass filtered version of Northwestern University N°6 (NU-6) (1)

                Nijmegen auditory processing test battery (19)

Time compressed speech, Time compressed plus Reverberation (1)

Hörtest mit zeitkomprimierter Sprache für Kinder (13)

Speech-in-noise tests

                Synthetic Sentence Identification test with Ipsilateral Competing Message (SSI-ICM)

                Lafon 60 (3)

                Nijmegen auditory processing test battery (19)

                Oldenburger Kinder-Satztest (11)

                Oldenburger Satztest (12)

                Göttinger Kindersprachvertändnistest im Störgeräusch .

                Freiburger Sprachtest im Störgeräusch.

Münchner Auditiver Sceeningtest für Verarbeitungs- und Wahrnehmungsstörungen (MAUS) (13)

Test de résistance de l’intelligibilité dans le bruit (Elbaz) (21)

Tests dichotiques

Dichotic Digits (Kimura, 1961, 3 items), (Musiek, 1983, 2 items).

Dichotic Consonant-Vowels (Berlin et al., 1972).

Staggered Spondaic Word Test (SSW) (Katz, 1962).

Competing Sentences Test (CST) (Willeford, 1968, ) (1).

Synthetic Sentence Identification Test with Controlateral Competing Message (SSI-CCM) (Jerger, 1974).

Dichotic Sentence Identification Test (Figer et al., 1983).

Monosyllabic words (SCAN) (4).

Dichotic Rhyme Test (DRT) .

Subtest dichotique du BAC (3).

Nijmegen auditory processing test battery (19)

Dichotischert Sprachtest für Kinder (14).

Dichotischer Hörtest (15).

Reconnaissance formes et configurations temporelles – Temporal Ordering Tasks

Pitch Pattern Sequence Test (PPST) (Pinheiro et Ptacek, 1971) (1) (3)

Duration Pattern Test (DPT) (Pinheiro et Musiek, 1985) (1) (3)

Psychoacoustic Pattern Discrimination Test (Blaettner et al.,1989)

Brain Fit Low-Level-Tests (16)

Nijmegen auditory processing test battery (19)

Tests d’interaction binaurale

 

Rapid Alternating Speech Perception (RASP) (Willeford and Bilger, 1978) (2)

Low-pass (500-800 Hz) – High-pass (1815-2500 Hz)

                Matzker, 1959

                Yvey, 1969 (2)

Segmented-Alternated CVC Fusion task (Wilson, Arcos and Jones, 1984) (1)

Interaural time or intensity Just Noticeable Differences (JND) (Pinheiro and Tobbin, 1969, Matzker, 1953)

Masking Level Difference (MLD) (1) (3) (Audiomètres commerciaux)

Nijmegen auditory processing test battery (19)

Binauraler Summationstest (9)

Références

(1) Tonal and Speech Materials for Auditory Perceptual   Assessment CD (1992), Long Beach, CA, Research and Development Service, Veteran’s Administration Central Office.

(2) Handbook of central auditory processing disorders in children.Willeford & Burleigh, 1985, New York: Grune & Stratton.

(3) Bilan Auditif Central , Demanez et al. 2003, Université de Liège, Service ORL, on CD-ROM.

(4) Screening Test for Auditory Processing Disorders, SCAN, Keith, 2000, on CD-Rom.

(5) www.biap.org/Discriminator (password: 211200627).

(6) Pilot Blankenfelde medizinisch electronische Geräte GmbH ( Blankenfelde 2000).

(7) Meditech Electronic GmbH, Wedemark (Warnke, 2000).

(8) M. Brunner, A. Seibert, A. Dierks, B. Körkel, Universitäts-HNO-Klinik Heidelberg, 2005.

(9) M. Ptok, Klinik für Phoniatrie und Pädaudiologie der MHH Hannover, 1997.

(10) W. Niemeyer, Bremen 1976.

(11) Hörtech GmbH, 2004.

(12) Hörtech GmbH, 2000.

(13) A. Nickisch, München 2000.

(14) A. Nickisch, C. Heuckmann, T. Burger, München 2003-2004, on CD-ROM.

(15) Uttenweiler, 1988.

(16) Feldmann, 1988.

(17) Audiva, 2007-2008.

(18) G. Mortier, Subtest des Züricher Lesetests, 1981.

(19) K. Neijenhuis, 2003

(20) Auditory speech sounds evaluation (A§E): a new test to assess detection, discrimination and identification in hearing impairment. P. Govaerts et al., Cochlear Implants Int. 2006 Jun; 7(2): 92-106.

(21) Elbaz P. et al., Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac, 1992; 109(7); 373-85.

(22) Lasry Y. 2011, Collège National d’Audioprothèse, www.college-nat.audio.fr